🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

According to recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple businesses who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.