🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.